Ideas Vs. Execution

I’m not sure this thought necessitates a post, but here it is.

I get ideas pitched to me all of the time.

Some of the ideas I hear are really good.  I think some people look for problems to solve, and I think that’s a great way to approach situations.  Others look at where they can extract value,  and their ideas generally reflect that approach.  Neither of these approaches are “wrong”, per se,  but I tend to like ideas that solve problems because they typically create net positive value in the world.

But what I like more than good ideas are examples of good execution.  The pool of people whom I know that can actually execute are consistently more interesting to be around because they actually make things.  I’ve come to a conclusion that there are people who think, people who execute and, rarely,  people who do both.  I will always look to do business with people who have a proven track record of execution over people who generate ideas, but not much more.

4 responses to “Ideas Vs. Execution”

  1. The new triple-bottom-line: Compose, Produce, Sell out MSG.

    I’m for it. I may have to make new groups in my address book for this.

    Although, there is good money to be made in connecting the dots.

    1. Christian Brucculeri Avatar
      Christian Brucculeri

      That’s a bold bottom line objective, my friend.

      Speaking of connecting dots, I want to pick your brain on these wireframes when you’re free

  2. Often what a good investor brings to the pie is the ability to identify skill sets in a team and bring in the missing ingredients.

    1. Christian Brucculeri Avatar
      Christian Brucculeri

      That’s a really good point, and is another reason that experienced investors make for good partners

Leave a comment